Re: All changes but huffman encoding integrated + a question from Martin Thomson on 2013-10-16 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from October to December 2013)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 20:35:05 -0700
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWrCkgcPuFdLgZ4=gNVnOUL-Ymeqv28TUy81uo1osZGRw@mail.gmail.com>

On 15 October 2013 19:25, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2) Make this illegal; This makes the encoder more complex as the encoder
> must attempt to do this encoding and then check to see if actually fit every
> time it does this kind of header representation.

Not to want to contradict Tatsuhiro, but I thought that you argued
pretty strongly for this one.  Something about a linear memory model.
I got the impression that this was OK with people, mainly because it
was perfectly consistent: evict, then add.

Did something change?

Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2013 03:35:31 UTC