Re: question about :authority header field from Martin Thomson on 2013-10-29 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from October to December 2013)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:58:54 -0700
To: RUELLAN Herve <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
Cc: Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVv3XrOja-mYSe928=koJ64ggVGWQY7Pm0Vc1T_HNoG2w@mail.gmail.com>

On 29 October 2013 10:57, RUELLAN Herve <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr> wrote:
> This is linked to issue #294: if we want to encourage implementations to omit host, we should probably leave it out of the static header table.

Encouraging avoidance doesn't mean that we should penalize it.  Adding
Host to the table probably doesn't have a huge impact, but I see no
reason not to add it.

Received on Tuesday, 29 October 2013 17:59:22 UTC