W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 10:31:15 -0800
Message-ID: <527A8AF3.4000304@gmx.de>
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2013-11-06 10:21, James M Snell wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> [snip]
>> I don't see the material difference.
>> If the client has no reliable way to find out what links are there it'll be
>> essentially restricted to edit those that it created itself.
>> It seems that this is the issue that needs to be addressed.
> This is not a problem I intend to solve... largely because I have no
> need to solve it. For one set of use cases I have, there is no need to
> discover established links, and for the remaining set, the data
> formats used already have ways of exposing whatever links the server
> wishes to expose.
> That said, have a concrete suggestion?

Maybe have a keyword for the "Prefer" header field that instructs the 
server to return *all* links upon GET?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 6 November 2013 18:31:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:19 UTC