W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies?

From: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:24:44 +0100
Message-ID: <c69cf035a973fc15ba4d3297f2b3b79a.squirrel@arekh.dyndns.org>
To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: "Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>, "Salvatore Loreto" <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>, "Roberto Peon" <grmocg@gmail.com>, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Le Jeu 12 décembre 2013 17:14, Poul-Henning Kamp a écrit :
> In message <34ada50c72b7ec498dd9745d59b4c3be.squirrel@arekh.dyndns.org>,
> "Nicol
> as Mailhot" writes:
>>That's where e2e integrity comes into play (and as end-user I'd
>>like to have it too). Besides that's a major part of reassuring users
>>nothing fishy is going on behind their back
> And as usual, once you start pulling on a single loose thread, you
> find out that it's tied to all the turtles:
> What good is e2e integrity, if you don't know who the other 'e' is ?

sure, but it's no better or worse than what exists in tls today, and tls
was good enough for most of the people that didn't want intermediaries to
tamper with content

Nicolas Mailhot
Received on Thursday, 12 December 2013 16:25:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:21 UTC