- From: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
- Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:24:44 +0100
- To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Cc: "Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>, "Salvatore Loreto" <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>, "Roberto Peon" <grmocg@gmail.com>, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Le Jeu 12 décembre 2013 17:14, Poul-Henning Kamp a écrit : > In message <34ada50c72b7ec498dd9745d59b4c3be.squirrel@arekh.dyndns.org>, > "Nicol > as Mailhot" writes: > >>That's where e2e integrity comes into play (and as end-user I'd >>like to have it too). Besides that's a major part of reassuring users >>nothing fishy is going on behind their back > > And as usual, once you start pulling on a single loose thread, you > find out that it's tied to all the turtles: > > What good is e2e integrity, if you don't know who the other 'e' is ? sure, but it's no better or worse than what exists in tls today, and tls was good enough for most of the people that didn't want intermediaries to tamper with content -- Nicolas Mailhot
Received on Thursday, 12 December 2013 16:25:13 UTC