Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations - missing Secure method from Martin Thomson on 2013-12-17 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from October to December 2013)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 09:01:24 -0800
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVeV0aFNbOgXaeGi_6dvD98cYs_NZPF4wht2xYdh5YTpg@mail.gmail.com>

On 17 December 2013 01:46, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> On 2013-12-17 10:35, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>>
>> FYI: RFC 2660 defines a "Secure" method which is omitted from the
>> current registry seeding list.
...
> As far as I can tell, this is something that is part of a protocol similar
> to HTTP, but not HTTP. Not sure whether it should be in the registry.

Yeah, probably not by my reading.

Received on Tuesday, 17 December 2013 17:01:52 UTC