- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 21:51:58 -0700
- To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 15 October 2013 21:07, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote: > The problem here occurs when one is evicting what one is adding. > > This can be handled without ever using more memory that allocated to the > compression context. One can also deal with this by copying just the name > (as opposed to the whole name+value-list), if one is willing to trade size > for complexity. Well, you were the one arguing for 2 before. If you're happy with either, that's good.
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2013 04:52:25 UTC