W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: #305 Header ordering

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 03:18:55 +1300
Message-ID: <528F67CF.3000704@treenet.co.nz>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 22/11/2013 2:57 p.m., Roberto Peon wrote:
> All of the proposals handle any potential nondeterminism amongst header
> fields with the same name, so that isn't a problem...
> -=R

Also keep in mind that 1.1->2.0 and 2.0->2.0 software is all going to be
fresh code. If the spec is clear enough on where multiple values are to
be found and how to handle there is no excuse for this mess to continue
outside of legacy 1.1 connections.

Received on Friday, 22 November 2013 14:19:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:20 UTC