- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 01:20:14 -0400
- To: Gili <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
- Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Gili <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> wrote: > Yes. Adding "on the server" and an example would definitely help. IMO, misunderstandings of this sort will continue so long as people fail to understand that idempotence and safety are properties of the request message alone, and are independent of implementation behaviour. Short of a minor treatise on it - a generalization of p2-4.2.1 2nd paragraph (re safety) perhaps (which I'm *not* proposing) - I don't think it will help, but may cause further confusion because of the mention of the server. That said, if consensus is for this addition, perhaps it should be "on the origin server" since, e.g., cache behaviour needn't be idempotent for idempotent messages, and is rarely safe for safe messages. Mark.
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2013 05:20:42 UTC