On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>wrote: > In message <5c8i891ufcgcljeblec314pm868deph6h6@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>, > Bjoer > n Hoehrmann writes: > > >I understood the comment as saying that the point does not belong on > >a "pro and contra" list, which seems fair enough in this instance. > > Why is having your protocol banned in USA or China not a "con" ? > TLS has not been banned in either China nor the USA. You claim there is a "risk" of that, but that's just an opinion, and not one we'll ever likely agree on. So, for this list, I was recommending we stick to objective criteria. Mike > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. >
Received on Sunday, 17 November 2013 20:59:12 UTC