- From: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
- Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 07:01:22 +0100
- To: "Roberto Peon" <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>, "Will Chan" <willchan@chromium.org>, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Tao Effect" <contact@taoeffect.com>, "Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "Zhong Yu" <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "James M Snell" <jasnell@gmail.com>, "Michael Sweet" <msweet@apple.com>, "Nicholas Hurley" <hurley@todesschaf.org>, "Tim Bray" <tbray@textuality.com>, "Mike Belshe" <mike@belshe.com>, "Willy Tarreau" <w@1wt.eu>
Le Jeu 14 novembre 2013 21:57, Roberto Peon a écrit : > .. And? And egg meet chicken you need the proocol to make the connexion work, but you're building a protocol that requires this connexion before working > On Nov 14, 2013 10:51 AM, "Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net> > wrote: > >> >> Le Jeu 14 novembre 2013 21:28, Roberto Peon a écrit : >> > A physical point to point connection would work well... >> >> A physical link does not provide a software protocol by itself >> >> -- >> Nicolas Mailhot >> >> > -- Nicolas Mailhot
Received on Friday, 15 November 2013 06:01:56 UTC