W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies?

From: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 19:18:21 +0100
Message-ID: <c50662216e18302cd3ff04aae4f49a82.squirrel@arekh.dyndns.org>
To: "Albert Lunde" <atlunde@panix.com>
Cc: "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Le Mar 3 décembre 2013 17:47, Albert Lunde a écrit :
> If this sort of proxy discovery/negotiation process is such an
> improvement, it seems like there might be merit to specifying it in
> parallel for HTTP/HTTPS 1.1 and HTTP/HTTPS 2.0, even if the messages and
> state management used aren't exactly identical.

I thought the aim of keeping http1 semantics was to allow http2-to-http1
bridges? If that's the case we only need good proxy support in http2, the
proxy will terminate the http2 link and translate to http1 for http1 web

Trying to fix http1 for proxies at this stage seems way too late (unless
http2 goes nowhere)


Nicolas Mailhot
Received on Tuesday, 3 December 2013 18:18:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:39 UTC