- From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 15:13:04 -0800
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAP+FsNeA=h=Xgv1G54TS20goXG-mZqLW4dS_zb+w6cmqFY2aSw@mail.gmail.com>
I have pictures of some of those signs from when I was cycling through Europe. :) As I mentioned in one of the myriad different threads, there are a number of engineering challenges that we definitely know about that we can work towards solving. I agree that we should keep speculation about political stuff out of the engineering! -=R On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>wrote: > > It's bedtime here in Denmark, but before I go to bed, I want to > thank for the wonderful 1980'ies hippie-vibe of the last couple of > days, it's been a wonderful nostalgic experience. > > I don't know how many of you remember "atomic weapon free zones" ? > > Maybe if you are younger, you might have seen a faded "Atomic Weapon > free Zone" sign somewhere ? > > What happened was that well-meaning city councils made lofty > proclamations and declared there city would never allow atomic > weapons inside city limits etc. > > It was of course an empty gesture, it's not like the military cared > what the Burgermeister of some dutch or german town signed, if they > needed to drive their nukes through, they would damn well drive > their nukes through the town-square. > > In some cases it was down-right laughably hypocritical. > > Does Berkeley still have their sign up ? Berkeley Uni made a fortune > running LLNL, which designed atomic bombs, but they were appearantly > not allowed to bring the work home with them, or something. > > Anyway... > > Ending the cold war, one nuclear-weapon free city after the other, > was as effective as slightly more encryption in HTTP/2.0 will > be at ending USAs "War Against Privacy". > > I do understand you are upset about it, so am I, and I do recognize > that when you have only a watchmakers screwdriver as tool, you use > the only tool you have. > > But rolling back the US police-state, a firmly nailed down > military-industrial complex with a budget measured in billions, and > what looks like almost unanimous political support of USgov, is not > going to happen because we tighten a screw somewhere in a internet > protocol. > > Sorry. > > If you want to do something about the polic-state, by all means get > involved in politics: Expose the lies, support the whistleblowers, > vote the bums out, run for office. > > But in this WG, please leave your politics at the door and > concentrate on the objective in our charter: Making a better > performing HTTP protocol. > > G'night... > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. > >
Received on Sunday, 17 November 2013 23:13:31 UTC