W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: Getting our definitions of encryption straight for the HTTP/2 security discussion

From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 16:20:04 -0800
Message-ID: <CAPik8yZL2wP9e5Q5v+xrgY+LeYZVj36e8U7aB7nSHxyxdhT7mw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Manger, James H" <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

I agree that my earlier term  "authenticated encryption" would have
collisions with other technologies, and I updated the definitions to match
James' wording.

Received on Thursday, 21 November 2013 00:20:31 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Adrien de Croy: "Re: Getting our definitions of encryption straight for the HTTP/2 security discussion"
Previous message: Paul Hoffman: "Re: Getting our definitions of encryption straight for the HTTP/2 security discussion"
In reply to: Manger, James H: "RE: Getting our definitions of encryption straight for the HTTP/2 security discussion"
Next in thread: Adrien de Croy: "Re: Getting our definitions of encryption straight for the HTTP/2 security discussion"
Reply: Adrien de Croy: "Re: Getting our definitions of encryption straight for the HTTP/2 security discussion"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:39 UTC