Re: #506, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24

• From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
• Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:49:59 -0700
• To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, apps-discuss@ietf.org, draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range.all@tools.ietf.org
• Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org, ietf@ietf.org
• Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20131030141311.0cf57b20@elandnews.com>

Hi Julian,
At 01:57 30-10-2013, Julian Reschke wrote:
>But then, we don't want the boilerplate to be in front of the 
>Introduction. Any *concrete* suggestion how to address this?

The sentence about "OPTIONAL feature" can be added to Section 3 of 
draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24.

I would consider adding some text to the paragraph in Section 2.5 of 
draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24 about "considered 
conformant".  This is to make it clear which features are part of basic HTTP.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy 

Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 21:51:50 UTC