Re: something I don't get about the current plan...

On 2013-11-17 23:50, Roberto Peon wrote:
> Securing the user<->home-router interaction is mostly orthogonal from
> using HTTP or HTTP2.

It is something people do today with 1.1.

> On the charter thing:
> Where does the charter mandate that we must replace HTTP/1.1 in every
> use-case?


>   It is expected that HTTP/2.0 will:
> ...
>   * Retain the semantics of HTTP/1.1, leveraging existing documentation (see
>     above), including (but not limited to) HTTP methods, status codes, URIs, and
>     where appropriate, header fields.
> ...

Best regards, Julian

Received on Monday, 18 November 2013 08:36:41 UTC