- From: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
- Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 23:33:54 +0100
- To: "Yoav Nir" <synp71@live.com>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Le Dim 17 novembre 2013 15:20, Yoav Nir a écrit : > On 17/11/13 2:16 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >> 2. it's disingenuous to claim tackling pervasive surveillance when >> nothing is done for the cookie networks whose sole aim is pervasive >> surveillance and which *are* an http "feature" (unlike TLS which is >> being bolted on) > True, but all previous attempts to make cookies better have failed. > > * The httpstate working group closed without standardizing "cake" > * Recent attempts to get websec to discuss next generation cookies > also failed to get people (especially browser vendors) interested. What was wrong with the solution that was proposed on this list a few months ago ? (by PHK IIRC) Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot
Received on Sunday, 17 November 2013 22:34:23 UTC