- From: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 02:17:34 +0000
- To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 6 November 2013 02:18:09 UTC
And #2 was only slightly stronger. On Nov 5, 2013, at 6:08 PM, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com<mailto:tbray@textuality.com>> wrote: I would have said the weakness of the #3 and #4 hums was very, very close. On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net<mailto:mnot@mnot.net>> wrote: … are up at: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/browser/wg_materials/ietf88/minutes.txt Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ Email secured by Check Point
Received on Wednesday, 6 November 2013 02:18:09 UTC