Re: Default stream priority

Seems reasonable to me on face value too. I haven't thought too much about
default values since Chromium always specifies a priority with our streams.
I'd be curious what non-browser (I assume all browsers do the same) clients
have to say here. Or servers who want a default in case the client doesn't
specify one.

On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Martin Thomson <>wrote:

> On 4 December 2013 13:49, William Chan (陈智昌) <>
> wrote:
> > What's the goal here? To make the default be low, but not the lowest
> > priority?
> As was requested, it was to set the priority default in the middle, so
> that only exceptional prioritization needs - in both directions -
> would require an explicit priority.  It sounds reasonable on face
> value at least.

Received on Thursday, 5 December 2013 07:42:02 UTC