*sigh* So, Stephen, do you support using encryption or not, and can we move that discussion to a separate thread? -=R On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>wrote: > > Hi, > > On 11/15/2013 05:18 PM, Roberto Peon wrote: > > and even > > submitted and contributed to a couple of drafts on the topic. > > I don't know if you mean a TLS MITM proposal or something > else. > > In the former case, please accompany any such proposal with > an analysis of the set of 176 RFCs [1] that reference 5246 > and the 91 that refer to 4246 [2] and the 167 that refer to > 2246 [3] to demonstrate that MITM'ing all of those is a good > and safe plan. And of course that ignores the non-IETF things > that might use TLS, which I'm sure is some medium sized > chunk of the 1573 [4] references that google scholar throws > up. > > Thanks, (or rather, "No, thanks"), > S. > > [1] http://www.arkko.com/tools/allstats/citations-rfc5246.html > [2] http://www.arkko.com/tools/allstats/citations-rfc4346.html > [3] http://www.arkko.com/tools/allstats/citations-rfc2246.html > [4] > > http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hjp.at%2Fdoc%2Frfc%2Frfc5246.html&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5 >
Received on Friday, 15 November 2013 17:39:20 UTC