- From: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
- Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 10:32:11 +0100
- To: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: "Matthew Kerwin" <matthew@kerwin.net.au>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Le Mer 20 novembre 2013 04:07, Mark Nottingham a écrit : Hi Mark > So, to be clear, you'd be OK with a separate Informational RFC called > something like "HTTP/2.0 for Web Browsers" or "HTTP/2.0 for the Open Web" > or similar, even if that spec constrained (or eliminated) using HTTP/2.0 > for http:// URLs? I wouldn't. That would only serve to provide an external varnish of support for browsers using TLS as a magic pill without actually looking at problems. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot
Received on Wednesday, 20 November 2013 09:32:39 UTC