- From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 14:13:48 +0900
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- CC: "William Chan (陈智昌)" <willchan@chromium.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Please also remember that in the IETF, meetings don't decide anything. Confirmation on the mailing list will always be needed. Regards, Martin. On 2013/12/05 11:53, Mark Nottingham wrote: > Really hard to tell, but my instinct is that if things go well, we'll be able to nail down some general agreements / approaches in Zurich, but we'll need to refine and incorporate them going forward. > > Generally, the feedback I'm getting so far is that we want to keep the pace up and deliver on schedule, which favours tight meetings like this (regardless of the exact topics). > > Cheers, > > > > On 5 Dec 2013, at 1:51 pm, William Chan (陈智昌)<willchan@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Is it unreasonable to hope that we'll "mostly" wrap up the security discussions in Zurich? I feel that there are plenty of people who are primarily interested in those discussions, and it'd be a shame to require them to attend multiple interims.
Received on Thursday, 5 December 2013 05:16:10 UTC