On 15/10/2013, at 4:42 AM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote: > From a security perspective this is an improvement over draft-nottingham-http2-encryption. Is the intent, therefore, to retire that draft? No; that draft will be pared down to just a proposal to use ALPN protocol identifiers in a different way, to achieve the effect of using TLS for "http://" URIs. Should be updated today. > It does seem that someone should answer the question, "Why not use DNS for this?" There's even a reasonable answer, which is that because this is a header, you are piggybacking it with data. And so it has been done. -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/Received on Tuesday, 15 October 2013 18:50:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:38 UTC