- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 09:58:27 -0800
- To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Cc: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 21 November 2013 19:36, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:34 PM, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote: >> Do we (yet) have a list of all the registered header fields for which >> order is insignificant? > > So far, the ones I know about are cookie and setcookie, but mainly because > those are the ones that I care about. More importantly, those are the ones that are *special*. Neither uses the standard list construction form and thus require special handling.
Received on Friday, 22 November 2013 17:58:55 UTC