- From: Fred Akalin <akalin@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 09:50:22 -0700
- To: Hervé Ruellan <ruellan.crf@gmail.com>
- Cc: Osama Mazahir <OSAMAM@microsoft.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANUYc_StOvPrPyxUcf3=jud2UQCnD-FTf=y3Lrk=d9XNfcCmbA@mail.gmail.com>
It seems tricky to me for an endpoint to use less than SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE for its encoding state, especially since it still has to use SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE for its decoding state. Since we already need an ack for a header table size change, can we perhaps piggyback a negotiated size (guaranteed to be <= the advertised size) onto that ack? So a client can just send SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE=5MB, and a memory-constraint server can ack with SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE=4K, and both sides will then use 4K. On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Hervé Ruellan <ruellan.crf@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi Osama, > > We discussed on this topic in the thread starting at: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2013OctDec/0221.html. > > Basically, an encoder can choose to keep only the first 4 KB of its table, > discarding the rest. It will just not make any reference to the entries in > the table above the first 4 KB. > It the encoder wants also to reference the static table, this is more > complex (see the referred to thread for more details). It will work if the > maximum table size is 8 KB, and the encoder keeps only 4 KB of it, it will > not really work if the encoder wants to only keep 4 KB of a 5MB table. > > Hervé. > > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 4:09 AM, Osama Mazahir <OSAMAM@microsoft.com>wrote: > >> Based on my understanding, the encoder and decoder have to have the >> exact same value for max-header-table-size so that the indices match. So >> if the client advertises SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE=5MB then that means the >> client-decoder is using a header-table with maxsize=5MB. Which means the >> server-encoder also has to use a header-table of maxsize=5MB. But if the >> server only wants to use 4KB of encoder space then after storing 4KB worth >> of header name/values, it can only reuse from the initially stored 4KB or >> emit literals (either as-is or Huffman encoded).**** >> >> ** ** >> >> So it seems to bound its memory usage, the server (in the above example) >> has to be choosy in what it adds to the server-encoder header-table because >> once something is added it cannot be removed (unless it decides to expand >> to 5MB+)?**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Thanks,**** >> >> --Osama.**** >> > >
Received on Friday, 25 October 2013 16:50:49 UTC