Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? from Martin Thomson on 2013-12-06 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from October to December 2013)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 15:35:33 -0800
To: Yoav Nir <synp71@live.com>
Cc: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org>, Werner Baumann <werner.baumann@onlinehome.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXdkHf+eq+LYZheKgU4zVLNN0uS=01iPtb_bryeB2c9GA@mail.gmail.com>

On 6 December 2013 15:32, Yoav Nir <synp71@live.com> wrote:
> The only TLS proxy I ever interact with is on the wired LAN at work.

If that's the case, then I actually don't have a big problem with the
UX you proposed.  I like the fact that there is no "Yah, whatever, get
out of my way" button anywhere.

I don't know how this solves the captive portal problem, but that
might be a different branch.

Received on Friday, 6 December 2013 23:36:00 UTC