- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 06:25:57 +0100
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 03:04:58PM +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote: > Also, I'm wondering what people (both sides) would think if we allowed http/2 > for http:// URLs (with or without opp encryption) for .local and RFC1918 > addresses, to ease the IoT / printer cases. I like this idea of making an exception for RFC1918 and .local addresses. We could use the same principle as an exception for accepting to connect to servers running a self-signed cert and reject it in all other situations (non .local and non rfc1918). Willy
Received on Monday, 18 November 2013 05:26:23 UTC