Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security

On 14/11/2013 6:31 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <>, "Nicol
> as Mailhot" writes:
>> You won't force enterprises not to MITM without giving them alternatives
>> to monitor their traffic, [...]
> Not to mention enterprises who are mandated by law to do so:
> Jails, Libraries, Schools, Mental Institutions are all subject to
> such restrictions one place or another on the plant.
> We may think that these laws are wrong, but this forum is not
> in a position to change them.
> And if we make a protocol that must be broken open to comply with The
> Law, it will be broken open, even if that compromises everybodys
> privacy, globally.



Received on Thursday, 14 November 2013 20:10:56 UTC