- From: Gili <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:10:18 -0500
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 14/11/2013 6:31 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <1b327a17d9e12ce91cc536b4cbdb8586.squirrel@arekh.dyndns.org>, "Nicol > as Mailhot" writes: > >> You won't force enterprises not to MITM without giving them alternatives >> to monitor their traffic, [...] > Not to mention enterprises who are mandated by law to do so: > > Jails, Libraries, Schools, Mental Institutions are all subject to > such restrictions one place or another on the plant. > > We may think that these laws are wrong, but this forum is not > in a position to change them. > > And if we make a protocol that must be broken open to comply with The > Law, it will be broken open, even if that compromises everybodys > privacy, globally. > +1 Gili
Received on Thursday, 14 November 2013 20:10:56 UTC