- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 08:42:09 +0100
- To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
- Cc: Yoav Nir <synp71@live.com>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@gmail.com>, Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, HTTP Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 08:20:22AM +0100, Eliot Lear wrote: > One of the things this conversation brings out is that there are many > use cases even at banks. Exactly, which is why we must always keep in mind that it is important to let implementers/users choose what they want and not try to decide for them what the protocol permits! > The consumer facing use case is quite > different than that of the employee/back office use case. Yes, but they will possibly converge. If properly designed, the protocol will permit safer proxies and we'll see more offers of filtered browsing for consumers. There's a lot of demand for this and end users never seem satisfied with what they have to use at home. Willy
Received on Monday, 2 December 2013 07:42:39 UTC