Re: #516 note about WWW-A parsing potentially misleading

* Julian Reschke wrote:
>On 2013-10-30 15:40, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>> The intent may have been to emphasise that having only one challenge per
>> WWW-Authenticate header does not mean no special care has to be taken. I
>> agree that it can be confusing; replacing the sub clause by "and" should
>> be fine.
>Not sure what your proposal is.

s/if more than one WWW-Authenticate header field is provided/and/ would
be a minimal solution that addresses the problem.

>How about:
>"User agents are advised to take special care in parsing the
>WWW-Authenticate header field, as each field value can contain more than 
>one challenge, and the header field itself can occur multiple times. 
>Furthermore, the contents of a single challenge can contain a
>comma-separated list of authentication parameters."

That would also work, but editorially it would be better to keep the two
comma cases together (comma separates challenges; comma separates para-
meters in challenges; then mention multiple headers).
Björn Höhrmann · ·
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 ·
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · 

Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 15:14:16 UTC