W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio

From: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:02:28 +0100
Message-ID: <cc2de36d0f294e25fab72e0f26b9d703.squirrel@arekh.dyndns.org>
To: "Roberto Peon" <grmocg@gmail.com>
Cc: "Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>, "Bruce Perens" <bruce@perens.com>, "Ryan Hamilton" <rch@google.com>, "David Morris" <dwm@xpasc.com>, "James Snell" <jasnell@gmail.com>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>

Le Ven 15 novembre 2013 08:25, Roberto Peon a écrit :
> You are saying that we should use a port other than :443 for https
> traffic?
> ... why?
> What backdoor are we talking about?

I'm saying that your whole problem with intermediaries in clear stems
directly from your attempts to push a new different protocol on a port
already used for something else (ie trying to enter through the back-door
like a juvenile delinquent because the guard on the main entry may object,
ensuring that he will consider you a suspicious character)

Nicolas Mailhot
Received on Friday, 15 November 2013 16:03:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:19 UTC