- From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
- Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:24:29 +0000
- To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com>
Hi, On 11/15/2013 05:18 PM, Roberto Peon wrote: > and even > submitted and contributed to a couple of drafts on the topic. I don't know if you mean a TLS MITM proposal or something else. In the former case, please accompany any such proposal with an analysis of the set of 176 RFCs [1] that reference 5246 and the 91 that refer to 4246 [2] and the 167 that refer to 2246 [3] to demonstrate that MITM'ing all of those is a good and safe plan. And of course that ignores the non-IETF things that might use TLS, which I'm sure is some medium sized chunk of the 1573 [4] references that google scholar throws up. Thanks, (or rather, "No, thanks"), S. [1] http://www.arkko.com/tools/allstats/citations-rfc5246.html [2] http://www.arkko.com/tools/allstats/citations-rfc4346.html [3] http://www.arkko.com/tools/allstats/citations-rfc2246.html [4] http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hjp.at%2Fdoc%2Frfc%2Frfc5246.html&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5
Received on Friday, 15 November 2013 17:24:54 UTC