W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: #520, was: Fwd: Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 with security considerations

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 13:52:47 +1300
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <57b6c6f5c2d458eb794e1d84cf366aba@treenet.co.nz>
On 2013-11-20 11:37, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Hi Kathleen,
> Personally - I'm not convinced, because the people who would benefit
> from that warning are almost certainly not going to be reading this
> document.
> We're already getting a lot of pushback on the size of our document
> set; we've often resisted adding advice like this to keep it
> manageable for implementers N avoid it becoming a "kitchen sink" spec.
> With my chair hat on - what do others think?

Good topic for one of the W3C security guideliens for implementation, 
but like already said: in HTTP that data is prety much opaque.

Received on Wednesday, 20 November 2013 00:53:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:20 UTC