Re: #520, was: Fwd: Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 with security considerations

On 2013-11-20 11:37, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Hi Kathleen,
> 
> Personally - I'm not convinced, because the people who would benefit
> from that warning are almost certainly not going to be reading this
> document.
> 
> We're already getting a lot of pushback on the size of our document
> set; we've often resisted adding advice like this to keep it
> manageable for implementers N avoid it becoming a "kitchen sink" spec.
> 
> With my chair hat on - what do others think?

Good topic for one of the W3C security guideliens for implementation, 
but like already said: in HTTP that data is prety much opaque.

Amos

Received on Wednesday, 20 November 2013 00:53:14 UTC