------ Original Message ------ From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: "Adrien de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com> Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> Sent: 20/11/2013 9:20:59 a.m. Subject: Re: RFC1918 + localhost >In message <em8b9ccf82-905d-4929-8c41-41362b024e61@bodybag>, "Adrien de >Croy" w >rites: > >>we need to forget about using this as a demarcation for allowability >>of >>plaintext or not. > >I'd say we need to stop this charade about us being in a position >to tell people where and when they can use plaintext... > >Are you really trying to reintroduce TLS with "NULL" crypto again ? Me? no, nor did I ever. That would be a waste of RTTs. I'm advocating choice. Like we currently have. > >-- >Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 >phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 >FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe >Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by >incompetence.Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2013 20:24:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:39 UTC