W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: RFC1918 + localhost

From: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 20:24:13 +0000
To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <em7527a904-a72d-42b7-a98e-0cf72638521a@bodybag>

------ Original Message ------
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To: "Adrien de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Sent: 20/11/2013 9:20:59 a.m.
Subject: Re: RFC1918 + localhost
>In message <em8b9ccf82-905d-4929-8c41-41362b024e61@bodybag>, "Adrien de 
>Croy" w
>>we need to forget about using this as a demarcation for allowability 
>>plaintext or not.
>I'd say we need to stop this charade about us being in a position
>to tell people where and when they can use plaintext...
>Are you really trying to reintroduce TLS with "NULL" crypto again ?

Me?  no, nor did I ever.  That would be a waste of RTTs.

I'm advocating choice.  Like we currently have.

>Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
>phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
>FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
>Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by 
Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2013 20:24:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:39 UTC