- From: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 20:11:14 +0000
- To: "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "Yoav Nir" <synp71@live.com>
- Cc: "HTTP Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
I had some thoughts about this. Chrome has the "incognito" frame. You could use a different browser frame. ------ Original Message ------ From: "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@gmail.com> To: "Yoav Nir" <synp71@live.com> Cc: "HTTP Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> Sent: 27/11/2013 7:47:40 a.m. Subject: Re: Yet another trusted proxy suggestion >On 26 November 2013 04:16, Yoav Nir <synp71@live.com> wrote: >> This allows adding some clever UX that shows the user what device is >> on-path, and also allows pre-configuring the trusted proxy based on >>name. > >I'm interested in learning what that clever UX looks like. A lot hinges >on it. >
Received on Tuesday, 26 November 2013 20:11:48 UTC