- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 09:04:57 -0800
- To: Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 3 November 2013 08:59, <bizzbyster@gmail.com> wrote: > Is there any reason why HTTP file transfer clients like curl and wget should > ever implement 2.0? That's not our choice. Though I would suggest that some of the wget modes of operation would benefit; and there are potentially some advantages to be gained from having opportunistic encryption for http: resources. > More radically, since there is no benefit for uploads, should HTTP 2.0 even > support the upload verbs? Absolutely yes. There's more to HTTP PUT than file upload. And the benefits to proxies and gateways in terms of multiplexing are incredible.
Received on Sunday, 3 November 2013 17:05:24 UTC