W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: I ran across this while working on the spec.

From: Abdelaziz Raji <abdelaziz.raji@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 13:06:23 -0700
Message-ID: <8568946518706761145@unknownmsgid>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>, RUELLAN Herve <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr>, Fred Akalin <akalin@google.com>, Roberto Peon <fenix@google.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Sent from my MOTOROLA ATRIX™ HD on AT&T

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:

On 17 October 2013 11:17, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:
> Lets call this #6.

For #6, I think that you want to allow indexed representations to use
the static set, otherwise you don't get to take advantage of the
values there, just the keys.  You might say, however, that indexing
these doesn't add them to the reference set.

I really don't have a particular preference here, but I do note that
there is a strict upper bound on the size of the reference set after
evicting all dynamic entries.  That is, it's the size of your
reference, times the size of the static table.  Have you considered
the "don't worry"?
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2013 20:06:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:19 UTC