- From: Tao Effect <contact@taoeffect.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 09:20:38 -0500
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <F5887EB7-1EB8-46D3-B0E2-6B13EBE96170@taoeffect.com>
Hi list! I only just heard about this discussion now, and so I signed up on the list. I strongly urge the HTTP working group and the IETF (if that's a different entity) to not rush this and allow more time for feedback from the internet community. The IETF is not the internet, and I assure you that there are a lot of people out there working on various solutions independently. They have valuable ideas to share, and feedback to offer. I think it's worth giving them a chance to speak before declaring something "HTTP 2.0". What I have read so far of the suggestions here leads me to think the ideas are still very immature. Correct me if I'm wrong, but is "HTTP/2.0" still using today's PKI/CA system? If so, it is not worthy of the "2.0" designation, as any system that preserves this broken system does not provide any meaningful security guarantees. Kind regards, Greg Slepak Tao Effect, LLC -- Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA. On Nov 13, 2013, at 9:04 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote: > * Mark Nottingham wrote: >> Your understanding of what happened seems like it’s different than the >> other people who I’ve spoken to. Regardless of that, however, we don’t >> need to discuss every option at physical meetings; we need to discuss >> them on the list. That’s what’s happening now. > > As I understand your message, the discussion is over, the decision has > been made. That is what various news media are reporting and what is > implied by your use of language like "revisit this decision". If your > purpose was not to record that the subject matter has received due > consideration on the mailing list and has now been decided and closed, > and just meant to make a proposal, then you should clarify accordingly. > -- > Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de > Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de > 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ >
Received on Wednesday, 13 November 2013 14:21:12 UTC