- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:31:02 +0100
- To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
- CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, ietf@ietf.org
On 2013-10-28 10:21, S Moonesamy wrote: > ... >> I believe that keeping new things in separate specs encourages people >> to use the registries instead of relying on a specific set of >> documents to provide the complete picture (today this already is a >> problem - people believing that things not described on 2616 are not >> "pure" HTTP). > > I suggest using the same STD for the set of documents. It might lessen > the above problem over time. -1. We have registries for exactly that purpose. They provide much better control and granularity than including RFCs into document sets. Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 28 October 2013 10:31:37 UTC