Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio from Nicolas Mailhot on 2013-11-14 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from October to December 2013)

From: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 21:05:18 +0100
To: "Roberto Peon" <grmocg@gmail.com>
Cc: "Bruce Perens" <bruce@perens.com>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Message-ID: <8219b9a2024bf396c6b241a82edebe42.squirrel@arekh.dyndns.org>

Le Jeu 14 novembre 2013 18:49, Roberto Peon a écrit :

> Your larger problem is not that http2 will do encryption, but rather that
> sites are choosing to use https. No protocol change or spec change can
> protect the HAM community from that sea-change.

That would be more convincing without the frantic attempts to make tls
mandatory instead of relying on web site choices…

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Received on Thursday, 14 November 2013 20:05:56 UTC