On 2013-10-29 20:35, Stephen Kent wrote: > ... > In Section 4.4 the text says: > > Note: The challenge grammar production uses the list syntax as > > well.Therefore, a sequence of comma, whitespace, and comma can > > be considered both as applying to the preceding challenge, or to > > be an empty entry in the list of challenges.In practice, this > > ambiguity does not affect the semantics of the header field value > > Should “both” be “either” in the above text? Does the potentially > ... Yes (done) > ambiguous construct ever take on both meanings simultaneously? > ... Yes, but these two meanings do not affect the semantics of the header field as a whole (it's either an empty entry in the list of auth parameters, or an empty challenge value). Best regards, JulianReceived on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 14:22:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:38 UTC