W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: [apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 09:25:00 +0000
Message-ID: <527B5C6C.6070302@ninebynine.org>
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
CC: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
On 06/11/2013 16:18, James M Snell wrote:
> (btw, getting back to your earlier question about the anchor
> attribute, I had honestly completely forgotten about the anchor target
> attribute! I've never actually seen it used in any practical sense so
> it had completely slipped my mind... to answer that particular
> question, yes, the server MUST consider the anchor attribute as being
> significant. I'll add a few more examples)

FWIW, a recent W3C note (not standard) suggests use of anchor, intended to allow 
some refinement of the intended referent of a provenance link, but I don't yet 
know of any implementations:


Received on Thursday, 7 November 2013 09:41:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:19 UTC