- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 09:25:00 +0000
- To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- CC: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
On 06/11/2013 16:18, James M Snell wrote: > (btw, getting back to your earlier question about the anchor > attribute, I had honestly completely forgotten about the anchor target > attribute! I've never actually seen it used in any practical sense so > it had completely slipped my mind... to answer that particular > question, yes, the server MUST consider the anchor attribute as being > significant. I'll add a few more examples) FWIW, a recent W3C note (not standard) suggests use of anchor, intended to allow some refinement of the intended referent of a provenance link, but I don't yet know of any implementations: http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-aq/ http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-aq/#resource-accessed-by-http #g --
Received on Thursday, 7 November 2013 09:41:27 UTC