- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 12:25:58 +1100
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>
Gentlemen, This thread is off-topic for this list, as per <http://www.w3.org/mid/21ACB8E5-BC29-4725-8333-7B96E3364AE9@mnot.net>. Please focus on proposing text for the spec. Cheers, On 20/11/2013, at 12:17 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > In message <CABaLYCvkt8y5CW-SiZx4UGZ_ns+FbKtkiKnAQzf38fXQ7ScHoA@mail.gmail.com> > , Mike Belshe writes: > >> As we're all aware, there are about 200 countries on this planet. Many of >> the governments of these countries are using packet siphoning as a key >> information gathering technique. It's easy today. They do this for many >> protocols beyond just HTTP. But what do they do with this information? We >> know the answer to this too - they are out to kill their dissidents. > > You need better sources on foreign policy than you currently rely on. > > For one thing, Wikipedia only knows of 23 countries which currently > have capital punishment is a legal outcome. > > I'm not aware of more than a handful of really uncivilized countries > which can legally kill or even indefinite detain ("life without > parole") people for political crimes. > > >> So when we don't protect everything from generic siphoning, we are >> facilitating murders and genocides. Is this dramatic? Yeah its dramatic. >> But is it untrue? No. > > Yes, very dramatic. > > And in fact untrue and unsubstantiated by any evidence I am aware of. > > People are in fact not widely persecuted for reading the news or > watching movies or even porn. > > Where and when they are, they are almost invariably sentenced on > either independent evidence, usually witnesses or police informers, > or on traffic logs which merely show that packets flowed between their > IP# and the servers IP# on the alleged time and date. > > That is not to say that The Global War On Privacy is not a Deep > Shit Situation for us, but unsubstantiated wild-eyed paranoid > pulling-scary-numbers-out-of-my-ass-alarmism is not the way to > confront the problem.. > > And for reasons already elaborated many times, your solution doesn't > work either. > > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 20 November 2013 01:26:26 UTC