- From: Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:37:46 -0400
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, apps-discuss@ietf.org, draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range.all@tools.ietf.org, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, ietf@ietf.org
Add a forward reference to the boilerplate after the uppercase word? On Oct 30, 2013, at 4:57 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > On 2013-10-30 08:46, S Moonesamy wrote: >> ... >>> Such as? >> >> What I mean is that what happens is undefined when both sides do not >> follow the RFC 2119 "should". > > The response is self-descriptive, so it's up to the client to properly process it. > >>> It is supposed to be interpreted per RFC 2119. >> >> It is better to use the uppercase words after the RFC 2119 boilerplate. > > But then, we don't want the boilerplate to be in front of the Introduction. Any *concrete* suggestion how to address this? > > Best regards, Julian > > > _________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 12:38:25 UTC