- From: David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
- Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 10:37:42 -0800 (PST)
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
AND, wget and curl are valuable diagnostic tools when websites are not working for whatever reason. So I'd recommend that their respective development communities implement 2.0 support On Sun, 3 Nov 2013, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 3 November 2013 08:59, <bizzbyster@gmail.com> wrote: > > Is there any reason why HTTP file transfer clients like curl and wget should > > ever implement 2.0? > > That's not our choice. Though I would suggest that some of the wget > modes of operation would benefit; and there are potentially some > advantages to be gained from having opportunistic encryption for http: > resources. > > > More radically, since there is no benefit for uploads, should HTTP 2.0 even > > support the upload verbs? > > Absolutely yes. There's more to HTTP PUT than file upload. And the > benefits to proxies and gateways in terms of multiplexing are > incredible. >
Received on Sunday, 3 November 2013 18:38:09 UTC