W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio

From: Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:10:13 -0800
Message-ID: <52865575.8060105@perens.com>
To: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
CC: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Ryan Hamilton <rch@google.com>, David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>, James Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>

text/html attachment: stored

Received on Friday, 15 November 2013 17:10:36 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Roberto Peon: "Re: How HTTP 2.0 mandatory security will actually reduce my personal security"
Previous message: Roberto Peon: "Re: Focusing our discussion on issues"
In reply to: Nicolas Mailhot: "Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio"
Next in thread: Roberto Peon: "Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio"
Reply: Roberto Peon: "Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio"
Reply: Mike Belshe: "Re: HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:38 UTC