- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 16:15:48 +1100
- To: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Cc: "William Chan (陈智昌)" <willchan@chromium.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Yes.... there are indeed many things for us to remember. Thanks for the reminder. On 5 Dec 2013, at 4:13 pm, Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote: > Please also remember that in the IETF, meetings don't decide anything. Confirmation on the mailing list will always be needed. > > Regards, Martin. > > On 2013/12/05 11:53, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> Really hard to tell, but my instinct is that if things go well, we'll be able to nail down some general agreements / approaches in Zurich, but we'll need to refine and incorporate them going forward. >> >> Generally, the feedback I'm getting so far is that we want to keep the pace up and deliver on schedule, which favours tight meetings like this (regardless of the exact topics). >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> >> On 5 Dec 2013, at 1:51 pm, William Chan (陈智昌)<willchan@chromium.org> wrote: >> >>> Is it unreasonable to hope that we'll "mostly" wrap up the security discussions in Zurich? I feel that there are plenty of people who are primarily interested in those discussions, and it'd be a shame to require them to attend multiple interims. -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 5 December 2013 05:16:19 UTC