- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:04:57 +0100
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
* Mark Nottingham wrote: >Your understanding of what happened seems like it’s different than the >other people who I’ve spoken to. Regardless of that, however, we don’t >need to discuss every option at physical meetings; we need to discuss >them on the list. That’s what’s happening now. As I understand your message, the discussion is over, the decision has been made. That is what various news media are reporting and what is implied by your use of language like "revisit this decision". If your purpose was not to record that the subject matter has received due consideration on the mailing list and has now been decided and closed, and just meant to make a proposal, then you should clarify accordingly. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Wednesday, 13 November 2013 14:05:27 UTC