RE: HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding from Mike Bishop on 2013-10-25 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from October to December 2013)

From: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 19:45:31 +0000
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Fred Akalin <akalin@google.com>
CC: Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com>, Hervé Ruellan <ruellan.crf@gmail.com>, Osama Mazahir <OSAMAM@microsoft.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <a922be3014fe42beb7e0b9de8cbf2395@BY2PR03MB025.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>

That introduces a new confusion around "apply" -- the setting I send reflects my expectation of your behavior.  Does that apply to me (the sending peer) because it's my state, or apply to you because you're the one who has to comply?  I think I prefer Martin's wording, focusing on them being sent individually -- let the descriptions of individual settings express who they "apply" to.

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 12:29 PM
To: Fred Akalin
Cc: Mike Bishop; Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa; Hervé Ruellan; Osama Mazahir; HTTP Working Group
Subject: Re: HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding

On 25 October 2013 12:10, Fred Akalin <akalin@google.com> wrote:
> Perhaps:
>
> "Settings apply only to the sending peer, and different ..." instead 
> of "Settings are sent independently by both peers."?

Sold.

Received on Friday, 25 October 2013 19:46:01 UTC