Sorry I thought by opportunistic encryption we were referring to Mark's Internet Draft -- http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00. On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com> wrote: > On Nov 3, 2013, at 12:17 PM, Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote: > >> On 3 November 2013 08:59, <bizzbyster@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Is there any reason why HTTP file transfer clients like curl and wget >> should >> > ever implement 2.0? >> >> That's not our choice. Though I would suggest that some of the wget >> modes of operation would benefit; and there are potentially some >> advantages to be gained from having opportunistic encryption for http: >> resources. >> > > Opportunistic encryption would be great if it gets in and I agree that > then there is a benefit for simple file transfers. > > > FWIW, HTTP/1.1 already has opportunistic encryption - see RFC 2817. > > _________________________________________________________ > Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair > >
Received on Sunday, 3 November 2013 22:58:01 UTC