W3C home
>
Mailing lists
>
Public
>
public-html@w3.org
>
August 2007
public-html@w3.org from August 2007 by date
1258 messages
:
Starting
Wednesday, 1 August 2007 00:36:44 GMT,
Ending
Friday, 31 August 2007 23:46:20 GMT
sort by
: [
thread
] [
author
] [ date ] [
subject
]
Mail actions
: [
mail a new topic
]
Help
: [
How to use the archives
] [
Search in the archives
]
Friday, 31 August 2007
Re: Prevalence of ill-formed XHTML
Philip Taylor
Re: keep conformance objective (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
James Graham
RE: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
John Foliot
Re: keep conformance objective (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
T.V Raman
Re: Downloading of images by UA
Jonas Sicking
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Sam Ruby
Re: Prevalence of ill-formed XHTML (was: Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml)
Robert Burns
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Philip Taylor
Prevalence of ill-formed XHTML (was: Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml)
Philip Taylor
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Jon Barnett
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Robert Burns
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Jon Barnett
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Leif Halvard Silli
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Roy T. Fielding
Microsoft review of HTML5 draft delayed
Chris Wilson
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Robert Burns
Re: Typos and suggestions for small corrections in WF2 Section 2 (Part of the detailed review of WF2)
David Håsäther
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Robert Burns
making better ad hoc use of class attribute values
Robert Burns
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Sam Ruby
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Sam Ruby
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Roy T. Fielding
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Robert Burns
Re: Typos and suggestions for small corrections in WF2 Section 2 (Part of the detailed review of WF2)
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Typos and suggestions for small corrections in WF2 Section 2 (Part of the detailed review of WF2)
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Screen-reader behaviour
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Robert Burns
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Robert Burns
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Mark Baker
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
James Graham
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Sam Ruby
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Mark Baker
Re: Examples for recommending alt omission needed for testing
Lachlan Hunt
WF2 2.13. Adding type attribute for the output element (Part of detailed review of WF2)
mikko.honkala@nokia.com
Re: Patterns for explicit associations
Olivier GENDRIN
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Dean Edridge
Typos and suggestions for small corrections in WF2 Section 2 (Part of the detailed review of WF2)
mikko.honkala@nokia.com
Re: Screen-reader behaviour
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Screen-reader behaviour
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Leif Halvard Silli
RE: Screen-reader behaviour
DESCHAMPS Stephane ROSI/SI CLIENT
Re: change "scientific documents" to "basic hypertext" (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Olivier GENDRIN
Examples for recommending alt omission needed for testing
Steve Faulkner
Re: Screen-reader behaviour
David Poehlman
Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5
Dean Edridge
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Mark Baker
keeping out semantic facilities for theoretical purity
Robert Burns
Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5
Karl Dubost
Re: "presentation concerns" out of scope? (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Marghanita da Cruz
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Screen-reader behaviour
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Screen-reader behaviour
Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: Screen-reader behaviour
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Jon Barnett
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Robert Burns
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Leif Halvard Silli
Thursday, 30 August 2007
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Kornel Lesinski
Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Philip TAYLOR
RE: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
Leif Halvard Silli
Is there a WIKI of test cases? Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
Marghanita da Cruz
product classes, "support some version of XML" (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Dan Connolly
let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Dan Connolly
keep conformance objective (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Dan Connolly
strike "This specification should be read like all other specifications." (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Dan Connolly
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
Arthur Jennings
auction sites and XHTML 2 (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Dan Connolly
"presentation concerns" out of scope? (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Dan Connolly
spell out HTML in title and/or abstract (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Dan Connolly
"vague subject referred to as Web Applications" (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Dan Connolly
change "scientific documents" to "basic hypertext" (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)
Dan Connolly
RE: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
John Foliot
Re: agenda 30 Aug HTML WG teleconference
Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Screen-reader behaviour
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Screen-reader behaviour
Al Gilman
Re: Screen-reader behaviour
Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
Olivier GENDRIN
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Sander Tekelenburg
RE: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Equivalents (was Re: Multilanguage alt/title)
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Equivalents (was Re: Multilanguage alt/title)
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Screen-reader behaviour
Joshue O Connor
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Leif Halvard Silli
Screen-reader behaviour
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Joshue O Connor
Re: Alt Text for A Key Part of the Content
Maurice Carey
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
Tighe K. Lory
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
Tighe K. Lory
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
Tighe K. Lory
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
Alastair Campbell
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
David Poehlman
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Jon Barnett
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
Tighe K. Lory
The only name for the xml serialisation of html5
Dean Edridge
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
Joshue O Connor
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
Olivier GENDRIN
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Joshue O Connor
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Steve Faulkner
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Maciej Stachowiak
RE: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
Alastair Campbell
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Steve Faulkner
Re: Equivalents (was Re: Multilanguage alt/title)
Marghanita da Cruz
Re: Multilanguage alt/title
Robert Burns
Re: Equivalents (was Re: Multilanguage alt/title)
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Multilanguage alt/title
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Robert Burns
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Boris Zbarsky
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Leif Halvard Silli
Equivalents (was Re: Multilanguage alt/title)
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Multilanguage alt/title
Robert Burns
Re: Multilanguage alt/title
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion)
Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Jon Gunderson
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Jon Barnett
Re: Multilanguage alt/title
Robert Burns
Re: Multilanguage alt/title
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Maciej Stachowiak
Wednesday, 29 August 2007
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Multilanguage alt/title
Robert Burns
agenda 30 Aug HTML WG teleconference
Chris Wilson
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Gez Lemon
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Jon Barnett
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Michael A Squillace
Re: Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
David Poehlman
Investigating the proposed alt attribute recommendations in HTML 5
Steven Faulkner
teleconference bridge for 30 Aug HTML WG teleconference
Dan Connolly
RE: Ruby in HTML
Richard Ishida
Re: Multilanguage alt/title
Gregory J. Rosmaita
RE: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
Andrew Kirkpatrick
RE: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
Andrew Kirkpatrick
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Robert Burns
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Thomas Broyer
Re[2]: <meta name=register>, Browser as passive tool
Dmitry Turin
Re[7]: <table presentation="pie"> (was: Re: <table chart="pie">)
Dmitry Turin
Re[5]: <pages> <page>...<page> </pages>
Dmitry Turin
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
Jason White
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Boris Zbarsky
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Robert Burns
Tuesday, 28 August 2007
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
Marghanita da Cruz
Detailed review of Section 2. The Document Object Model.
Lee Kowalkowski
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
Robert Burns
Re: Multilanguage alt/title
Robert Burns
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
RE: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
Alastair Campbell
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
James Graham
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
Joshue O Connor
RE: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
Debi Orton
Re: Alt Text for A Key Part of the Content
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Alt Text for A Key Part of the Content
Ben Boyle
Re: Multilanguage alt/title
Sander Tekelenburg
RE: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
Andrew Kirkpatrick
Re: Removing the data attribute on <object> (detailed review of Semantics)
Michael A. Puls II
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Multilanguage alt/title
Olivier GENDRIN
Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI
Olivier GENDRIN
Re: Serialize U+00A0 as in HTML? (detailed review of Serializing HTML fragments)
Boris Zbarsky
Re: Serialize U+00A0 as in HTML? (detailed review of Serializing HTML fragments)
Alexey Proskuryakov
Re[2]: Decision cube
Dmitry Turin
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
Lachlan Hunt
Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI
Karl Dubost
Re: [whatwg] Offline Web Apps
Elliotte Harold
Monday, 27 August 2007
Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI
Marghanita da Cruz
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
Joshue O Connor
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Robert Burns
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Boris Zbarsky
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Boris Zbarsky
Re: Serialize U+00A0 as in HTML? (detailed review of Serializing HTML fragments)
Julian Reschke
Re: Serialize U+00A0 as in HTML? (detailed review of Serializing HTML fragments)
Simon Pieters
Re: Serialize U+00A0 as in HTML? (detailed review of Serializing HTML fragments)
Julian Reschke
Serialize U+00A0 as in HTML? (detailed review of Serializing HTML fragments)
Simon Pieters
Re: Re[3]: <pages> <page>...<page> </pages>
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Robert Burns
Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI
Lachlan Hunt
Re: Re[5]: <table presentation="pie"> (was: Re: <table chart="pie">)
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Boris Zbarsky
Re: Marking Up Accessible Comic Strips
Simon Pieters
Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI
Patrick H. Lauke
Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI
Olivier GENDRIN
Re: <meta name=register>, Browser as passive tool
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: <meta name=register>, Browser as passive tool
Julian Reschke
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Robert Burns
Re[5]: <table presentation="pie"> (was: Re: <table chart="pie">)
Dmitry Turin
Re[6]: <table presentation="pie"> (was: Re: <table chart="pie">)
Dmitry Turin
Re[3]: <pages> <page>...<page> </pages>
Dmitry Turin
Re[3]: <meta name=register>, Browser as passive tool
Dmitry Turin
correction of auto-table and auto-tree
Репейный Вадим
auto-table & presentation=decart
Репейный Вадим
<table><tside>: displaying of table 3x100 of DBMS as table 10x10
Репейный Вадим
Decision cube
Репейный Вадим
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Boris Zbarsky
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Roy T. Fielding
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Robert Burns
Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI
Marghanita da Cruz
Re: Alt Text for A Key Part of the Content
Marghanita da Cruz
Sunday, 26 August 2007
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Robert Burns
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Julian Reschke
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Robert Burns
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Julian Reschke
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Robert Burns
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Boris Zbarsky
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Robert Burns
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Robert Burns
Re: Marking Up Accessible Comic Strips
Olivier GENDRIN
Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI
Olivier GENDRIN
Alt Text for A Key Part of the Content
Lachlan Hunt
Marking Up Accessible Comic Strips
Lachlan Hunt
Re: how to get my login info?
Cameron McCormack
how to get my login info?
Garrett Smith
Saturday, 25 August 2007
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Magnus Kristiansen
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Roy T. Fielding
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Magnus Kristiansen
Re: Form Serialization
Garrett Smith
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Roy T. Fielding
Friday, 24 August 2007
Re: This Working Group needs a Secretary
Shawn Medero
RE: non-conforming authoring tools: the backplane of portals, networking & photo sites
Gloria Reece
Saturday, 25 August 2007
Re: Image Equivalent Content Wiki page
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Magnus Kristiansen
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Patrick Garies
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Julian Reschke
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Magnus Kristiansen
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Julian Reschke
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Magnus Kristiansen
Re: Image Equivalent Content Wiki page
Philip TAYLOR
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Julian Reschke
Friday, 24 August 2007
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Magnus Kristiansen
Re: [whatwg] Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue)
Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion)
Robert Burns
Re: This Working Group needs a Secretary
Dan Connolly
Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion)
James Graham
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Boris Zbarsky
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Boris Zbarsky
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion)
James Graham
Re: [whatwg] Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue)
Robert Burns
Re: This Working Group needs a Secretary
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: [whatwg] Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue)
Maciej Stachowiak
[HDP] Why Accessibility Is An Important & Essential Principle
Gregory J. Rosmaita
RE: [whatwg] Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue)
John Foliot
Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion)
Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Image Equivalent Content Wiki page
Robert Burns
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Philip Taylor
RE: [HDP] Other comments from RI
Richard Ishida
RE: [HDP] Missing principles
Richard Ishida
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Robert Burns
This Working Group needs a Secretary
Sam Ruby
Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI
Olivier GENDRIN
Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI
Olivier GENDRIN
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Julian Reschke
Re: non-conforming authoring tools: the backplane of portals, networking & photo sites
Lachlan Hunt
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Ian Hickson
Re: Offline Web Apps
Robert Burns
Re: Offline Web Apps
Marghanita da Cruz
Re: <object> content-type sniffing (detailed review of Semantics)
Boris Zbarsky
Re: <object> content-type sniffing (detailed review of Semantics)
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: <object> content-type sniffing (detailed review of Semantics)
Boris Zbarsky
Re: [whatwg] Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue)
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Offline Web Apps
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: <object> content-type sniffing (detailed review of Semantics)
Sander Tekelenburg
Offline Web Apps
Ian Hickson
Re: An open letter to Anne van Kesteren
Karl Dubost
Re: An open letter to Anne van Kesteren
Michael A. Puls II
Re: [HDP] Missing principles
Karl Dubost
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Roy T. Fielding
Thursday, 23 August 2007
Re: [HDP] Missing principles
Marghanita da Cruz
[HDP] principle "Universal Access"
Gregory J. Rosmaita
RE: Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue)
John Foliot
Re: Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue)
Robert Burns
RE: An open letter to Anne van Kesteren
John Foliot - Stanford Online Accessibility Program
Re: Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context
Marghanita da Cruz
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Ian Hickson
RE: Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue)
Dan Connolly
Re: "real life" longdesc examples
Patrick H. Lauke
RE: Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue)
John Foliot
"real life" longdesc examples
Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue)
Dan Connolly
Re: Answering the question...
scott lewis
Answering the question...
John Foliot
Re: Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context
Thomas Higginbotham
non-conforming authoring tools: the backplane of portals, networking & photo sites
Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context
Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: <object> content-type sniffing (detailed review of Semantics)
Boris Zbarsky
Re: conformance (was Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element)
Dan Connolly
Re: <object> content-type sniffing (detailed review of Semantics)
Boris Zbarsky
Re: Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context
Thomas Higginbotham
[HDP] Other comments from RI
Richard Ishida
Re: <object> content-type sniffing (detailed review of Semantics)
Sander Tekelenburg
An open letter to Anne van Kesteren
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: [HDP] Missing principles
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context
James Graham
[HDP] Missing principles
Richard Ishida
Re: Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context
Maurice Carey
conformance (was Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element)
Ben Boyle
Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
<object> content-type sniffing (detailed review of Semantics)
Simon Pieters
Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element
Ben Boyle
Re: Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context
Lachlan Hunt
Re: Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire
Leif Halvard Silli
Re: [HDP] Secure by design
Joshue O Connor
Re: [HDP] Secure by design
Robert Burns
Re: Finding Real Use Cases for Longdesc
Robert Burns
Re: [HDP] Secure by design
Lachlan Hunt
Re: Finding Real Use Cases for Longdesc
Andrew Sidwell
Re: [HDP] Secure by design
Joshue O Connor
Finding Real Use Cases for Longdesc
Lachlan Hunt
Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element
Boris Zbarsky
Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element
Boris Zbarsky
Re: (Un)Ordered lists
Dylan Smith
Re: Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire
Marghanita da Cruz
Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire
Sander Tekelenburg
Add Example Explaining that Alt Text is Dependent Upon the Context
Lachlan Hunt
Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire
Lachlan Hunt
Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire
Sander Tekelenburg
[HDP] Secure by design
Robert Burns
Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire
Leif Halvard Silli
Re: [HDP] Support World Languages
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Forms Taskforce participation
Maciej Stachowiak
[HDP] Pave the Cowpaths
Robert Burns
Re: Whitespace after </body> (detailed review of parsing algorithm)
Ian Hickson
Re: Forms Taskforce participation
Robert Burns
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Robert Burns
Re: Forms Taskforce participation
Matthew Raymond
Re: Whitespace after </body> (detailed review of parsing algorithm)
Michael A. Puls II
Wednesday, 22 August 2007
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Marghanita da Cruz
Re: Whitespace after </body> (detailed review of parsing algorithm)
Ian Hickson
Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire
Magnus Kristiansen
[HDP] Rename "Pave the Cowpaths" to something less analogy-prone
Andrew Sidwell
Re: Forms Taskforce participation
Dan Connolly
Re: [HDP] Support World Languages
Robert Burns
Re: [HDP] Solving real problems
Robert Burns
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Roy T. Fielding
Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire
James Graham
Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element
Mihai Sucan
Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element
Boris Zbarsky
Re: Forms Taskforce participation
Robert Burns
Re: Forms Taskforce participation
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Forms Taskforce participation
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element
Mihai Sucan
Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element
gonchuki
Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element
Dan Connolly
Re: Review of 3.15.1. The table element
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire
Joshue O Connor
Review of 3.15.1. The table element
Mihai Sucan
Web Forms 2.0 and a Cross-Browser Implementation
Weston Ruter
Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire
Lachlan Hunt
Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
L. David Baron
Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire
Joshue O Connor
Re: [HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire
Julian Reschke
[HDP] Response to Review of HTML Design Principles Questionnaire
Lachlan Hunt
Case-insensitive comparison (part of my detailed review of tokenization)
Thomas Broyer
Removing the data attribute on <object> (detailed review of Semantics)
Simon Pieters
Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Dan Connolly
Re: Forms Taskforce participation
Dan Connolly
Whitespace after </body> (detailed review of parsing algorithm)
Simon Pieters
Re: (code, sample output and keyboard/device input <code>, <samp>, <kybd>) part of my review of 3.12 Phrase elements
Olivier GENDRIN
Re: Review of 3.14.11. The canvas element
Philip Taylor
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Chris Blouch
Re: User Testing elements of HTML 5 spec
Dan Connolly
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
David Poehlman
Supporting real accessibility Re: Seeing the open issues
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Review of 3.14.11. The canvas element
Mihai Sucan
Re: Forms Taskforce participation
Josef Spillner
Re: Difference of content model of |ins| and |del| (part of detailed spec review of Edits)
Ian Hickson
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Ian Hickson
Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Michael A. Puls II
Re: Forms Taskforce participation
Ian Hickson
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Ian Hickson
Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Robert Burns
Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Robert Burns
Tuesday, 21 August 2007
RE: Forms Taskforce participation
McClure, David M
Wednesday, 22 August 2007
Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Michael A. Puls II
Re: Forms Taskforce participation
Sander Tekelenburg
Fwd: Review of Distributed Extensibility in HTML5
Karl Dubost
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Patrick H. Lauke
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: getting feedback from other w3c "accessibility" lists (was: A better ALT)
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Sam Ruby
Re: Forms Taskforce participation
Matthew Raymond
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: link warmth
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: getting feedback from other w3c "accessibility" lists (was: A better ALT)
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Robert Burns
Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Karl Dubost
Re: Forms Taskforce participation
Matthew Raymond
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Karl Dubost
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Roy T. Fielding
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Roy T. Fielding
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Marghanita da Cruz
Re: Seeing the open issues
Philip Taylor
Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Michael A. Puls II
Tuesday, 21 August 2007
Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Robert Burns
Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Michael A. Puls II
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Ian Hickson
Re: Forms Taskforce participation
Matthew Raymond
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
ryan
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
L. David Baron
Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Roy T. Fielding
Re: Forms Taskforce participation
Dan Connolly
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Ian Hickson
Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Doug Schepers
Re: Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM)
Ian Hickson
Re: Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM)
Maciej Stachowiak
RE: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Chris Wilson
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Forms Taskforce participation
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Robert Burns
Re: Seeing the open issues
Steve Faulkner
Re: no mention of BOMs in sniffing algorithm
ryan
Re: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Robert Burns
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Chris Blouch
Re: Review of 3.14.11. The canvas element
Philip Taylor
Re: (Un)Ordered lists
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: (Un)Ordered lists
Simon Pieters
Re: Seeing the open issues
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Roy T. Fielding
Re: Seeing the open issues
Ian Hickson
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (new thread?)
Dan Connolly
Re: Rewriting |m|
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: (Un)Ordered lists
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (new thread?)
Sam Ruby
Rewriting |m|
Geoffrey Sneddon
Visible greater-than sign (part of detailed review of edits)
Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Suggestions for the Pave the Cowpaths Examples
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM)
liorean
Difference of content model of |ins| and |del| (part of detailed spec review of Edits)
Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes
Lachlan Hunt
Review of 3.14.11. The canvas element
Mihai Sucan
Re: Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM)
Simon Pieters
RE: IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Chris Wilson
Re: Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM)
Simon Pieters
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Leif Halvard Silli
(Un)Ordered lists
Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM)
João Eiras
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Joshue O Connor
Re: Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM)
liorean
RE: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Richard Conyard
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Chris Blouch
Re: no mention of BOMs in sniffing algorithm
Dan Connolly
Re: Forms Taskforce participation
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community (new thread?)
Dan Connolly
Re: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes
Ben Boyle
Re: Forms Taskforce participation
Dan Connolly
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Robert Burns
Re: Suggestions for the Pave the Cowpaths Examples
Ben Boyle
Re: document.title (detailed review of the DOM)
Simon Pieters
IE's AND EVERYONE ELSE'S object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Robert Burns
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Leif Halvard Silli
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Julian Reschke
Re: Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM)
Simon Pieters
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM)
Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Seeing the open issues
Steve Faulkner
Implementing HTMLDocument on all Documents (detailed review of the DOM)
Simon Pieters
IE's object implementation problems (was RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Sander Tekelenburg
HTML5 - Video and audio codecs for video elements
Marghanita da Cruz
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Julian Reschke
Re: Seeing the open issues
Ian Hickson
Re: Seeing the open issues
Steve Faulkner
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Karl Dubost
Re: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes
Robert Burns
Re: Other syntax: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax
Robert Burns
Re: [Offtopic] Re: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes
Robert Burns
Re: Forms Taskforce participation
Ian Hickson
Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion)
Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: Forms Taskforce participation
Matthew Raymond
Hierarchical link types
Philip Taylor
no mention of BOMs in sniffing algorithm
ryan
Monday, 20 August 2007
Re: numeric character references and Unicode surrogate pairs: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax
Cameron McCormack
is OBJECT broken? if so by whom & what can be done?
Gregory J. Rosmaita
Permitted slash not defined in terms of void elements (part of my detailed review of the tokenization section)
Thomas Broyer
RE: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes
Richard Conyard
Re: Seeing the open issues
Ian Hickson
Seeing the open issues
Ian Hickson
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Sam Ruby
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Ian Hickson
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Ian Hickson
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Sam Ruby
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Ian Hickson
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Ian Hickson
Re: Suggestions for the Pave the Cowpaths Examples
Julian Reschke
Re: Suggestions for the Pave the Cowpaths Examples
Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Suggestions for the Pave the Cowpaths Examples
Julian Reschke
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Sam Ruby
Suggestions for the Pave the Cowpaths Examples
Lachlan Hunt
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Maciej Stachowiak
content type configuration prototype, usability testing? [was: review ... by IETF/HTTP community]
Dan Connolly
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Sam Ruby
RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?
Chris Wilson
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Robert Burns
Re: numeric character references and Unicode surrogate pairs: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax
Philip Taylor
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Julian Reschke
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Lachlan Hunt
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
James Graham
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Julian Reschke
Re: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes
Maurice Carey
Re: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes
Patrick H. Lauke
Re: numeric character references and Unicode surrogate pairs: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax
Philip Taylor
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Sam Ruby
[Offtopic] Re: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes
Thomas Broyer
Re: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes
Maurice Carey
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Dan Connolly
Re: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes
Lachlan Hunt
Re: Placeholder Text for Text Boxes
Maurice Carey
Placeholder Text for Text Boxes
Lachlan Hunt
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Julian Reschke
process proposals should start off-list [was: ... categorize messages and threads]
Dan Connolly
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Dan Connolly
Re: numeric character references and Unicode surrogate pairs: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax
Julian Reschke
Re: numeric character references and Unicode surrogate pairs: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax
Cameron McCormack
Re: numeric character references and Unicode surrogate pairs: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax
Anne van Kesteren
Review of table processing model (section 3.15.11. Processing model)
James Graham
Re: Other syntax: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax
Anne van Kesteren
Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?]
Robert Burns
Re: M| Motion to use prefix to categorize messages and threads (Robert's Rules of Order over Email)
Rob Burns
Re: abbreviation exposition and pronunciation
Robert Burns
Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?]
Olivier GENDRIN
Re: M| Motion to use prefix to categorize messages and threads (Robert's Rules of Order over Email)
Lachlan Hunt
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Robert Burns
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Jon Gunderson
Sunday, 19 August 2007
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Robert Burns
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Robert Burns
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Karl Dubost
Re: abbreviation exposition and pronunciation
Karl Dubost
Re: M| Motion to use prefix to categorize messages and threads (Robert's Rules of Order over Email)
Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
M| Motion to use prefix to categorize messages and threads (Robert's Rules of Order over Email)
Rob Burns
Design Principles Premise
Laura Carlson
numeric character references and Unicode surrogate pairs: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax
Robert Burns
Re: abbreviation exposition and pronunciation
Matthew Raymond
Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?]
Robert Burns
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Robert Burns
Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?]
Jason White
Saturday, 18 August 2007
Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?]
Philip Taylor
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Joshue O Connor
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Robert Burns
Re: Stripping leading line feeds
Philip Taylor
Stripping leading line feeds
Philip Taylor
Re: A better longdesc
Joshue O Connor
Re: A better ALT
Peter Krantz
A better ALT
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Joshue O Connor
getting feedback from other w3c "accessibility" lists (was: A better ALT)
Gregory J. Rosmaita
A better ALT
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG
Robert Burns
[HDP] 3.3. Media Independence
Robert Burns
editorial comment about "4.7.4. Content-Type sniffing: feed or HTML"
ryan
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Robert Burns
Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG
Jason White
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Robert Burns
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Lachlan Hunt
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Robert Burns
Friday, 17 August 2007
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Sam Ruby
Re: review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Ian Hickson
review of content type rules by IETF/HTTP community
Dan Connolly
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Joshue O Connor
Thursday, 16 August 2007
Re: Form Serialization
Ian J. Wessman
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Ian J. Wessman
Friday, 17 August 2007
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Ian J. Wessman
Editorial issues (part of detailed review of "Determining the type of a new resource in a browsing context")
Geoffrey Sneddon
Step 10 of Feed/HTML sniffing (part of detailed review of "Determining the type of a new resource in a browsing context")
Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG
Dan Connolly
Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG
Dan Connolly
Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion)
Philip Taylor
please review "XHTML Role Attribute Module" working draft
Dan Connolly
<figure> and <img> (was Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG)
Jon Barnett
Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG
Maurice Carey
Re: table, cell, heading, leader, trailer, header, footer, runner, TABLE, THEAD, TFOOT, part of my review of 3.15 Tabular data
Ben Boyle
review of HTML Design Principles - questionnaire
Steven Faulkner
Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?]
Joshue O Connor
Re: [Spam] Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?]
Joshue O Connor
Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?]
Steven Faulkner
[HDP] 3.3. Media Independence
Marcin Hanclik
Re: table, cell, heading, leader, trailer, header, footer, runner, TABLE, THEAD, TFOOT, part of my review of 3.15 Tabular data
Karl Dubost
Re: HTML Design Principles Review
Joshue O Connor
Re: Ian's Approach to Editing (Was: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state)
Robert Burns
Re: Ian's Approach to Editing (Was: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state)
Smylers
Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?]
Robert Burns
Re: Form Serialization
Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?]
Smylers
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Robert Burns
Re: table, cell, heading, leader, trailer, header, footer, runner, TABLE, THEAD, TFOOT, part of my review of 3.15 Tabular data
Robert Burns
Re: table, cell, heading, leader, trailer, header, footer, runner, TABLE, THEAD, TFOOT, part of my review of 3.15 Tabular data
Karl Dubost
Re: Form Serialization
Edward O'Connor
Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?]
Robert Burns
Re: QA vs. Baby Steps, Cowpaths, RealProblems
Leif Halvard Silli
QA vs. Baby Steps, Cowpaths, RealProblems
Leif Halvard Silli
Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?]
Robert Burns
Re: [HDP] error in "Support World Languages"
Leif Halvard Silli
Re: [HDP] error in "Support World Languages"
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Robert Burns
Re: Form Serialization
Jon Barnett
Thursday, 16 August 2007
[HDP] error in "Support World Languages"
Leif Halvard Silli
[ FIELDSET ] - disabled and readonly
Garrett Smith
Form Serialization
Garrett Smith
Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?]
Jon Barnett
Re: HTML Design Principles Review
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML Design Principles Review
Dan Connolly
Re: Support for Design Principles
Lachlan Hunt
Re: Support for Design Principles (was: Design Principles survey delayed)
Dan Connolly
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?
Maciej Stachowiak
Fwd: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?
Jon Barnett
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?
James Graham
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?
James Graham
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?
Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: link warmth
Geoffrey Sneddon
RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?
Evans, Donald
Re: link warmth
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Wednesday, 15 August 2007
link warmth
Michael Horn
Thursday, 16 August 2007
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?
Jan Richards
Re: 4.5. Interfaces for URI manipulation
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Olivier GENDRIN
Re: Design Principles survey delayed
Maciej Stachowiak
HTML Design Principles Review
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">)
Robert Burns
Empty vs no alt attribute (was Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?
William Loughborough
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Robert Burns
Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">)
Philip Taylor
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Philip Taylor
Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">)
Robert Burns
Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">)
Robert Burns
Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">)
Philip Taylor
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Robert Burns
4.5. Interfaces for URI manipulation
Ben Boyle
Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">)
Robert Burns
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Philip Taylor
Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">)
James Graham
Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">)
Robert Burns
Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">)
Robert Burns
Re: Support for Design Principles (was: Design Principles survey delayed)
Steven Faulkner
Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">)
James Graham
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Robert Burns
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Robert Burns
Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">)
Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Philip Taylor
Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG
Robert Burns
Re: Evidence of usefulness of specific accessibility solutions (was Rewording the Design Principles)
Joshue O Connor
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?
scott lewis
Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion)
Joshue O Connor
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?
scott lewis
Re: Maxmizing Useful alt Text (Was: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Smylers
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Robert Burns
Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG
Ian Hickson
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?
aurélien levy
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Philip Taylor
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?
Robert Burns
Re: Omitting alt Where It's Unknown (Was: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?)
Smylers
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?
Jason White
Re: Support for Design Principles (was: Design Principles survey delayed)
Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?
Robert Burns
Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state
Jason White
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?
Lachlan Hunt
Re: using an attribute to categorize the @alt state
Robert Burns
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?
Jason White
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?
James Graham
Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG
Robert Burns
using an attribute to categorize the @alt state [was Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?]
Robert Burns
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Robert Burns
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Lachlan Hunt
Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG
Karl Dubost
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?
Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG
Robert Burns
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?
Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Robert Burns
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Robert Burns
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Lachlan Hunt
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?
Jason White
edits to the draft should reflect the consensus of the WG
Robert Burns
Re: Other syntax: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax
Robert Burns
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?
Lachlan Hunt
Re: Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">)
Robert Burns
Re: The arbitrary 80% (Baby Steps)
Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Robert Burns
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Robert Burns
Re: [admin] W3C Wiki migration
Karl Dubost
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Philip Taylor
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Robert Burns
Wednesday, 15 August 2007
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Robert Burns
Re: Research needs tracking
Robert Burns
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?
James Graham
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Philip Taylor
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Robert Burns
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?
Patrick H. Lauke
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Robert Burns
Re: unconference agenda for HTML WG meeting 8-9 Nov?
Dan Connolly
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Michael A. Puls II
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
practical use/techniques of alt attribute for images
Karl Dubost
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Robert Burns
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?
Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: agenda HTML WG 16 Aug: design principles, spec reviews, table headers, XML serialization name, forms TF, ...
Ian Hickson
Re: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?
James Graham
agenda HTML WG 16 Aug: design principles, spec reviews, table headers, XML serialization name, forms TF, ...
Dan Connolly
Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?
Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Lachlan Hunt
Re: Distributed Extensibility
Dan Connolly
Forms Taskforce participation
Dan Connolly
Design Principles survey delayed
Dan Connolly
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Michael A. Puls II
Re: Research needs tracking
Dan Connolly
agenda HTML WG teleconference 16 Aug (in progress)
Dan Connolly
RE: Ruby in HTML
Chris Wilson
Re: [admin] W3C Wiki migration
Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: [admin] W3C Wiki migration
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Philip TAYLOR
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Philip Taylor
Re: Keeping some order in the wiki
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Keeping some order in the wiki
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research
Ben Boyle
Re: Serializing PIs in HTML (detailed review of Serializing HTML fragments)
Michael A. Puls II
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Robert Burns
Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research
Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Editorial: "child node" (detailed review of Serializing HTML fragments)
Simon Pieters
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Philip Taylor
<object>: should the name attribute be allowed for form submission with plug-ins?
Michael A. Puls II
Serializing PIs in HTML (detailed review of Serializing HTML fragments)
Simon Pieters
Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research
Robert Burns
Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research
Ben Boyle
Requirements for research (Was: Dropping <input usemap="">)
Ian Hickson
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Robert Burns
Re: editing the wiki Re: The arbitrary 80% (Baby Steps)
Jason White
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Lachlan Hunt
Re: table, cell, heading, leader, trailer, header, footer, runner, TABLE, THEAD, TFOOT, part of my review of 3.15 Tabular data
Robert Burns
Re: editing the wiki Re: The arbitrary 80% (Baby Steps)
Karl Dubost
Tuesday, 14 August 2007
Evidence of usefulness of specific accessibility solutions (was Rewording the Design Principles)
Sander Tekelenburg
Wednesday, 15 August 2007
editing the wiki Re: The arbitrary 80% (Baby Steps)
Karl Dubost
Re: The arbitrary 80% (Baby Steps)
Ian Hickson
Re: The arbitrary 80% (Baby Steps)
Jason White
Re: Keeping some order in the wiki
Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Keeping some order in the wiki
Robert Burns
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Jason White
Re: Keeping some order in the wiki
Sander Tekelenburg
The arbitrary 80% (Baby Steps)
Ian Hickson
Tuesday, 14 August 2007
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Wednesday, 15 August 2007
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Robert Burns
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Jason White
Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research
Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Stephen Ferg's Table Research
Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Ruby in HTML
Karl Dubost
Re: [admin] W3C Wiki migration
Dan Connolly
Re: Keeping some order in the wiki
Gregory J. Rosmaita
Tuesday, 14 August 2007
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Ian Hickson
Re: Keeping some order in the wiki (was Re: problem-statements for HTML 4.01 differences)
Robert Burns
Re: Improving the Header Relationship Algorithm (Discussion)
Robert Burns
Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion)
T.V Raman
Keeping some order in the wiki (was Re: problem-statements for HTML 4.01 differences)
Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion)
James Graham
Heuristic Tests for Data Tables (Discussion)
Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Lachlan Hunt
Re: Dropping <input usemap="">
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Dropping <input usemap=""> (was: Rewording the Design Principles: Pave the Cowpaths and Don't Reinvent the Wheel)
Lachlan Hunt
Starting On Topic (Rant)
Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: Rewording the Design Principles: Pave the Cowpaths and Don't Reinvent the Wheel
Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: highlighting of "major known issues" in the working draft
Lachlan Hunt
Re: Rewording the Design Principles: Pave the Cowpaths and Don't Reinvent the Wheel
Lachlan Hunt
Re: highlighting of "major known issues" in the working draft
Steven Faulkner
Re: Rewording the Design Principles: Pave the Cowpaths and Don't Reinvent the Wheel
James Graham
Re: highlighting of "major known issues" in the working draft
Lachlan Hunt
Re: Rewording the Design Principles: Pave the Cowpaths and Don't Reinvent the Wheel
Tom Morris
Re: Other syntax: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax
Robert Burns
Re: Other syntax: part of my review of 8 The HTML syntax
Robert Burns
highlight